|
1-9 QA for WBL
Page history
last edited
by p.bailey@btinternet.com 13 years, 1 month ago
Area of focus |
1 Institutional readiness |
Criterion |
1-9 QA for WBL |
Main statement |
Are there (Sufficient/necessary) Quality Assurance procedures are in place for WBL? |
Self assessment guidelines
|
- Employers (& partner providers) fully understand the implications of academic quality and standards.
- The HE institution has full oversight of all assessment decisions and has a direct relationship with any assessor.
- Mechanisms are in place to profile and scope tutors, assessors and external examiners to meet specific WBL methods and contexts and to ensure comparability of standards.
- Separate external examiners are engaged to focus on skills/competencies and on subject matter.
- The workplace is fit-for-purpose as a place of learning.
- Procedures are in place for learner assessments and peer assessments.
- Tutors, assessors and mentors have the relevant competencies at the appropriate level.
- Procedures are in place for employers as mentors and assessors (& other third parties such as partner providers).
|
Evidence to look for
|
- Employers are included in programme design and validation processes
- There is a process for gathering feedback from Employers and mentors.
- External examiners have relevant background and knowledge of WBL
- There are sufficient support mechanisms in place for WBL e.g. mentoring, peer support.
- There is a timley process to feedback quality issues to employers involved in WBL courses.
|
Further info and examples
|
|
1-9 QA for WBL
|
Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
|
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.