Area of focus |
1 Institutional readiness |
Criterion |
1-8 WBL procedures and processes for programme validation |
Main statement |
Procedures and processes for programme approval and validation accommodate the particular needs and requirements of WBL programmes.
|
Self assessment guidelines
|
- There is a programme approval & validation process for assessing and accrediting learning (including learning not provided by the organisation) which focuses on providing a fast-track and lean process.
- Processes provide flexibility for taking on part-time academic staff within a suitable timeframe.
- Processes to support negotiated programmes with employers.
|
Evidence to look for
|
- A Professional Practice Accreditation “shell framework” provides a basis for the development/derivation of bespoke/personalised awards that can be fast-tracked for approval while maintaining the essential rigour
- Validation and accreditation processes reflect the needs of WBL courses.
- Validation procedures allow for short courses and smaller modules
- Timing of validation allows for validation of WBL courses at any time of the year
- Dedicated staff responsible for WBL validation centrally ad/or in faculties
- Assessment procedures are timed to allow learning to be accredited at times appropriate for WBL and there is provision for AP(E)L
- Job descriptions for part-time staff working in WBL have been agreed.
(See Criteria 3 Programme Design)
|
Further info and examples
|
University of Bradford Professional Studies awards framework and shell frameworks at Derby, Plymouth
|