|
3-5 APEL
Page history
last edited
by Peter Chatterton 13 years, 2 months ago
Area of focus |
3 Programme design |
Criterion |
3-5 APEL |
Main statement |
Processes for APEL/APCL within WBL modules are sufficient to meet the needs of all employers/employees.
|
Self assessment guidelines |
- New frameworks include opportunities for APEL/RPL, opportunities for work experience (within an agreed proportion of the overall credits) and recognition that skills are perceived at different levels in different sectors.
- APEL/RPL policies and processes are in place and credit transfer can be used to underpin progression. Is this an integrated part of the assessment process?
- The provision of WBL is sustainable should models of funding change.
- There a consistency of approach common between employers/institution to APEL.
- The process of APEL/RPL is scalable between differing programmes/employers.
|
Evidence to look for |
- APL policy and procedure in place and linked to assessment policy
- APL promoted and encouraged with details of how to make a claim and who to contact
- Faculties have named individuals for APL
- The policy includes APEL and APCL.
- The cost of APEL and APCL is set at an institutional level and there is a clear policy on how much of a courses can be APL’s, and at what stage of the process.
- The APL process has been modelled for individuals and groups
- There are tools (e.g. an e-portfolio) for learners to collate evidence for APEL
- There are clear polices on whether part modules can be APL and a process for learners meeting the remaining outcomes.
|
Further info and examples |
|
3-5 APEL
|
Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
|
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.