|
1-7 Staff development, recognition and reward
Page history
last edited
by Will Stewart 13 years ago
Area of focus |
1 Institutional readiness |
Criterion |
1-7 Staff development, recognition and reward |
Main statement |
Mechanisms are in place to support and recognise staff for WBL.
|
Self assessment guidelines
|
- Work-based learning is accepted as a valid academic model of learning. Parity of esteem exists between academics and practitioners in relation to academic and vocational approaches.
- All those involved with the design, delivery, assessment and validation of programmes are competent in relation to work-based learning and its attendant focus on new learning models and vocational skills - providing the appropriate mix of skills, knowledge and experience (e.g. representing both work-based learning skills, generic business skills and subject-specific skills).
- Staff are assessed and appropriately trained to ensure that they can engage fully with WBL programme design and delivery e.g. WBL pedagogic models and ICT/e-learning tools.
- Reward mechanisms are designed to benefit academic involvement in WBL.
- Academic staff CPD/training programmes incorporate designing and delivering for work-based degrees using the appropriate mix of ICT/e-learning.
|
Evidence to look for
|
- There are staff working specifically on WBL.
- There are teaching fellows (or similar) in WBL roles.
- WBL is mentioned within the annual appraisal systems
- Training for WBL is included in the academic staff development programme (and staff are encouraged to attend)
- There is a recognised award for teaching WBL in the institution.
|
Further info and examples
|
University of Derby - WorkBased Learning Fellows?
|
1-7 Staff development, recognition and reward
|
Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
|
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.